Skip to content
CardixPrime UK

Could Different States Follow Australia's in Banning Social Platforms for Under-16s?

The nation's bold action to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of countries are considering similar measures.

  • The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
  • Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the AI".
  • Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the options in reserve".
  • In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to enact a law raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
  • In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
  • The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a good starting point," stated a leading MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Charities have expressed warnings. An organization founded by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are safe and age appropriate for children," said a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, legislation is largely happening at the state government level amid country-wide inaction.

  • The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
  • The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
  • Virginia has approved a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further access needing parental permission.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various figures to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, further nations are similarly taking action.

  • Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
  • The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide debate continues, the policies of this nation and others indicate that governments globally are increasingly willing to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.

JC
By

James Cook

A UK-based cardiologist with 15 years of experience, specializing in preventive heart care and patient education.

CardixPrime UK

Type to search articles.